Forum Discussion

As with most of your posts, much ado about nothing.

Awwww....
So nice of you to ignore Bushes lying...
Nixon would have been proud.

No lies here. He can declassify info. That's not a leak. Leaks are a deliberate unauthorized disclosure of information. Look it up.

>No lies here. He can declassify info. That's not a leak. Leaks are a deliberate unauthorized disclosure of information. Look it up.

ok...
But disclosing an identity of an undercover CIA agent is illegal. So if you declassify that information, you break the law.

No one ever said that Bush authorized declassifying the identity of Valerie Plame (who was not covert, anyway).

Yeah we are still wait on that exact bit of information.

Meanwhile enjoy:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/06/washington/06cnd-leak.html?ex=1301976000&en=2b041507356c3290&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

--snip--

The presidential authorization was provided, the court papers said, in advance of a meeting on July 8, 2003 between Mr. Libby and Judith Miller, then a reporter for the New York Times. Mr. Libby brought a brief abstract of the N.I.E.'s key judgments to the meeting with Ms. Miller in the lobby of the St. Regis Hotel about two blocks from the White House.

....

Ms. Miller never published anything about the contents of the intelligence estimate.

....

Mr. Libby testified that at the meeting, he did not discuss Mr. Wilson's wife, because "he had forgotten by that time that he learned about Ms. Wilson's C.I.A. employment a month earlier from the Vice President."

Ms. Miller, in her Oct. 16, 2005, account of the meeting, said that her notes showed that the two had discussed Mr. Wilson's wife, who, according to her notes, worked in a unit of the C.I.A. that is engaged in the intelligence assessments of unconventional weapons.
--snip---

People can read between the lines.

So a white house chief goes to talk to a journalist about parts of a disclosed report and a wife of Mr. Wilson.

Then said reporter never publishes anything about the report.
But she does publish identity of Ms. Plame after that meeting.


Jim, I have to tell you, people can read between the lines.

Looks like you should have been reading the actual lines, instead of between them.

Thats right. I posted on TON on extremely important to this country topics. Of course you choose to bicker on an old one.

I figured I would give you time to recant and apologize. I wasted a lot of time debating this non-issue.

I don't live in the forum. I don't have that much time to reply to all your stuff.

>I figured I would give you time to recant and apologize.
Riiighhhhttt....

>I don't have that much time to reply to all your stuff.
That is mainly because you are a coward. To you democracy is an obstacle to having Mr. Bush deciding everything.
Real issues got nothing on you. To you the other side are not PEOPLE!!!!

To you holding people in prison and torturing is ok, so you would sit in your house and FEEL safe!!! You do not even want to give these people a chance at trial. Or to show whether they are terrorists or not. YOU sir a A COWARD.

Only a coward would say, I will surrender my own and other people civil rights and freedom so I could feel safe.

See, why would I bother posting anyway? You just tell me what I feel and say anyway? Tell me more about my views.

Not feel and say. Do!!!